Every B2B SaaS marketer I speak to is running Google Ads. Most are running LinkedIn Ads. A handful are testing Meta. Almost none are running Microsoft Ads - and that gap is quietly costing them pipeline.
Here's the situation: Google Ads CPCs for B2B SaaS keywords in the UK now average £3-£6 per click, with competitive enterprise terms regularly exceeding £15. LinkedIn CPCs sit at around £4 per click but without search intent. Meanwhile, Microsoft Ads runs at roughly 40% lower CPC than Google for equivalent terms, reaches a higher-income and more senior professional audience, and offers something no other search platform can: LinkedIn profile targeting layered directly onto keyword campaigns.
This article is a practical guide for B2B SaaS marketers and founders who want to diversify paid media intelligently. Not "try Bing and see what happens" - but build a properly structured Microsoft Ads programme that generates qualified pipeline at a lower cost than your existing channels.
Key Takeaways
- Microsoft Ads CPCs are approximately 40% lower than Google for equivalent B2B SaaS terms
- Microsoft is the only search platform that offers LinkedIn profile targeting (job title, seniority, company size, industry) layered onto search intent
- Bing powers Microsoft Copilot - strong Bing presence directly feeds AI search visibility
- B2B SaaS companies running coordinated Google + Microsoft campaigns capture 15-25% more qualified leads at a blended CPC 18-30% lower than Google alone
- Microsoft Ads works best for B2B SaaS companies with ACV above £10k and an ICP of Director level and above
The Case for Microsoft Ads in B2B SaaS
Let's address the obvious objection first: "Nobody uses Bing."
It's not true - and more importantly, it's not the right question. The question isn't how many people use Bing. It's who uses Bing, and whether those people match your ICP.
The Bing audience skews older, more senior, and higher income than Google's. Approximately 41% of Bing users earn over £75k per year. The platform over-indexes heavily for desktop usage - which means it reaches people at their work computers, inside corporate environments, during working hours. For enterprise and mid-market B2B SaaS companies targeting Finance Directors, Heads of Operations, or IT decision-makers, this is precisely the demographic that's expensive and difficult to reach affordably on Google.
There's also a structural reason why Bing is underused: most B2B SaaS companies are run by people who use Google personally and assume their buyers do too. They're not wrong that Google dominates. But "dominant" doesn't mean "only." And in paid advertising, less competition directly translates to lower cost.
The Microsoft network is broader than most people realise. When you run Microsoft Ads, your campaigns can appear across:
- Bing search results
- Microsoft Edge browser (the default browser on every Windows device)
- MSN homepage and news
- Outlook.com
- Microsoft Start
- The LinkedIn Audience Network (for display and native)
- Xbox (for certain formats)
For a B2B SaaS company targeting UK businesses, this is a meaningful reach - not a niche experiment.
The LinkedIn Targeting Advantage Nobody Talks About
This is the single most compelling reason for B2B SaaS companies to run Microsoft Ads, and it's almost entirely overlooked.
Microsoft acquired LinkedIn in 2016. That acquisition gave Microsoft Ads something no other search platform has: the ability to layer LinkedIn professional profile data directly onto search campaigns.
In practice, this means you can target people who are:
- Searching for your category keywords on Bing and
- Hold a specific job title (e.g. Head of Finance, VP of Operations)
- Work in a specific industry (e.g. SaaS, FinTech, Professional Services)
- Are at a specific seniority level (Director, VP, C-suite)
- Work at a company of a specific size (e.g. 50-500 employees)
No other search platform can do this. Google cannot combine search intent with professional identity at this level of precision.
To illustrate why this matters: imagine you're a B2B SaaS company selling finance automation software. On Google, you're bidding on "accounts payable automation software UK" and getting clicks from finance managers, junior accountants, students doing research, and the occasional competitor. You're paying £8-12 per click for a mixed-quality audience.
On Microsoft Ads, you can bid on the same keyword and restrict delivery to Finance Directors and CFOs at UK companies with 50-500 employees. Your click volume drops - but your lead quality improves dramatically. For high-ACV SaaS products where a single closed deal justifies significant CAC, this trade-off is almost always worth making.
How to set this up:
- Navigate to your campaign in Microsoft Ads
- Go to the "Audiences" tab within the campaign or ad group
- Select "LinkedIn Profile Targeting"
- Layer by Job Function, Job Title, Industry, Company Size, or Seniority
- Set as a bid modifier (recommended: +20-30% for your core ICP) rather than a targeting exclusion - this preserves reach while prioritising quality traffic
One important note: LinkedIn targeting works as a bid modifier, not a hard filter. You're telling Microsoft to prioritise showing your ads to these profiles, not to exclude everyone else. This is the right approach - it keeps your reach healthy while concentrating spend on your highest-value audience.
Setting Up Microsoft Ads for B2B SaaS: The Right Way
The most common mistake B2B SaaS marketers make when starting with Microsoft Ads is importing their Google Ads campaigns and assuming the job is done. The import tool is a useful starting point - it saves time on initial setup - but Microsoft's auction dynamics, audience behaviour, and automation maturity are different enough to warrant a distinct approach.
Here's how to build a Microsoft Ads programme that actually performs.
Campaign Structure
Organise your campaigns by funnel stage and intent type:
Branded campaigns - Your brand name and variants. These protect your brand in Bing results and are typically very low CPC. Always run these.
Competitor campaigns - Bidding on competitor brand names. Often lower competition on Bing than Google, making this a cost-effective way to appear when buyers are evaluating alternatives.
Solution-aware campaigns - Keywords where the buyer knows what type of solution they need: "B2B payment automation software", "SaaS spend management platform". High intent, core revenue-driving campaigns.
Problem-aware campaigns - Keywords where the buyer is searching around a pain point rather than a solution: "reduce manual invoice processing", "automate expense approvals". Lower intent but often lower CPC and useful for top-of-funnel.
Separate these into distinct campaigns rather than mixing them. This gives you clean budget control and performance data for each stage.
Match Types
Use phrase match and exact match to start. Microsoft's broad match matching is less sophisticated than Google's, and without strong conversion data to guide it, broad match will burn budget on irrelevant queries. Once you've accumulated 60-90 days of data and are generating consistent conversions, you can cautiously test broad match with tight negative keyword lists.
Bidding Strategy
Start with Manual CPC. This gives you maximum control while you learn how the Microsoft auction behaves for your keywords and audience. The CPCs will likely surprise you on the low side compared to Google.
Once you're generating 30 or more conversions per month, move to Target CPA automated bidding. Microsoft's Smart Bidding is less mature than Google's - it needs more data to work effectively - so don't rush the transition. Patience here pays off.
Conversion Tracking
Install the Universal Event Tracking (UET) tag - Microsoft's equivalent of Google's gtag. This is non-negotiable. Without it, you have no performance data and Smart Bidding cannot function.
Set up conversion goals for:
- Demo request form completions
- Contact form submissions
- Phone call clicks (if relevant)
- Key page visits (e.g. pricing page, case study page) as secondary micro-conversions
If you have CRM data, connect offline conversion imports. Passing lead quality signals back to Microsoft Ads - particularly for SaaS companies with longer sales cycles - dramatically improves the quality of automated bidding over time.
Ad Copy
Microsoft's audience tends to respond to more formal, professional ad copy than Google's broader demographic mix. For B2B SaaS, lead with efficiency and ROI language:
- "Reduce manual processing time by 60%"
- "Built for finance teams at growing SaaS companies"
- "No long-term contracts. Senior specialists only."
Test two to three ad variations per ad group. Microsoft Responsive Search Ads work similarly to Google's - up to 15 headlines and 4 descriptions, mixed and matched by the platform. Pin your strongest headline in position one to maintain message control.
Microsoft Ads vs. Google Ads for B2B SaaS: Where Each Wins
These platforms are not competitors - they're complements. The question isn't which one to run, it's understanding what each does best so you allocate budget intelligently.
Advertisers running coordinated Google and Microsoft Ads campaigns typically capture 15-25% more total qualified leads at a blended CPC that is 18-30% lower than Google alone. The platforms reach different segments of the same buying audience - running both is simply more complete coverage.
A practical budget split for B2B SaaS companies new to Microsoft Ads: start with 15-20% of your Google Ads budget allocated to Microsoft. This is enough to gather meaningful data without significant risk. If CPL comes in at or below Google levels (which it often does), scale accordingly.
The Copilot Opportunity: Why This Goes Beyond Search
Here's the angle that almost no B2B SaaS marketer is thinking about yet.
Microsoft Copilot - the AI assistant embedded across Microsoft 365, Windows, and Edge - uses Bing as its primary web grounding source. When a Finance Director asks Copilot to "find me the best accounts payable automation software for a 200-person SaaS company," Copilot draws its answer from Bing's index.
This means that running Microsoft Ads and maintaining strong Bing organic signals does more than drive search traffic. It increases the likelihood that your brand appears in Copilot AI responses - which are now embedded into the daily workflow of over 1.5 billion Microsoft 365 users.
B2B buyers are already using Copilot for vendor research. They're asking it to shortlist options, compare features, summarise reviews, and draft RFP criteria. If your brand has no Bing presence - no organic rankings, no structured data, no Microsoft Ads signals - you are invisible in this channel.
The practical implication: optimising for Bing in 2026 is not just about Bing search traffic. It is about being visible in the AI assistant that enterprise buyers use inside Microsoft Teams, Outlook, Word, and Edge every single day. This is the paid media and AI visibility crossover that most agencies are completely ignoring.
What Results to Expect: Realistic Benchmarks for B2B SaaS
Set honest expectations before you start. Microsoft Ads will not replace Google Ads volume - and that is not the goal.
Click volume: Expect 15-30% of your Google Ads volume on equivalent terms. For most B2B SaaS companies, this is meaningful but not transformative in isolation.
CPC: Typically 35-45% lower than Google for the same keywords. UK B2B SaaS terms that cost £8-12 on Google often run at £4-7 on Microsoft.
Conversion rate: Often comparable to Google, sometimes higher. The more senior, higher-intent audience means fewer irrelevant clicks diluting your conversion data.
CPL: Frequently at or below Google CPL, despite lower volume. This is the metric that matters most for B2B SaaS - and it is where Microsoft Ads consistently surprises marketers who expected it to underperform.
Time to optimise: Allow 60-90 days before drawing firm conclusions. Microsoft's auction needs time to learn, and your conversion data needs time to accumulate.
Microsoft Ads works best for B2B SaaS when:
- Your ACV is high enough to justify lower volume (typically £10k+ ACV)
- Your ICP is Director level and above - LinkedIn targeting adds real value here
- You're in a competitive Google niche where CPCs are eating into unit economics
- You want Copilot AI visibility as well as traditional search presence
- You have a clear demo or free trial offer that converts well on search
It is less suited when:
- You're at very early stage with limited budget - get Google working first, then add Microsoft at around £2-3k/month spend
- Your product has a very broad demographic (consumer or prosumer)
- Your sector genuinely has low Bing usage - check your GA4 referral data and look for any existing Bing organic traffic before investing
A Note on Getting Started
The practical barrier to starting Microsoft Ads is low. If you're already running Google Ads, you can import your campaigns directly into Microsoft Ads in under 30 minutes. Use that import as a foundation, then apply the structural and bidding adjustments outlined above.
The bigger barrier is psychological: most B2B SaaS marketers have never considered Microsoft Ads a serious channel. That perception gap is exactly why the opportunity exists. Less competition, lower CPCs, and a senior professional audience are available precisely because most of your competitors haven't bothered to show up.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Microsoft Ads worth it for B2B SaaS in the UK?
Yes - particularly for companies with high ACV and a senior ICP. Microsoft Ads CPCs run approximately 40% lower than Google for equivalent terms, and the LinkedIn profile targeting feature allows precision targeting of specific job titles and seniority levels that no other search platform offers.
How much budget do I need to start Microsoft Ads?
A minimum of £1,500-£2,000 per month is needed to gather statistically meaningful data within a reasonable timeframe. We recommend starting with 15-20% of your current Google Ads budget and scaling based on CPL performance.
Can I just import my Google Ads campaigns into Microsoft Ads?
You can use the import as a starting point, but you should not treat it as a finished setup. Match type behaviour, audience dynamics, and bidding strategy need to be adjusted for the Microsoft platform specifically.
What is LinkedIn profile targeting in Microsoft Ads?
Because Microsoft owns LinkedIn, Microsoft Ads allows you to layer LinkedIn professional data - job title, seniority, industry, company size - onto your search campaigns as bid modifiers. This means you can prioritise showing ads to, for example, Finance Directors at UK SaaS companies with 50-500 employees. No other search platform offers this capability.
How does Microsoft Ads affect Copilot AI visibility?
Microsoft Copilot uses Bing as its primary web grounding source. Maintaining strong Bing organic and paid signals increases the likelihood that your brand appears in Copilot responses when buyers ask about solutions in your category. This makes Microsoft Ads relevant not just for traditional search, but for AI search visibility in 2026 and beyond.
How long before I see results from Microsoft Ads?
Allow 60-90 days for meaningful optimisation. The first 30 days are primarily data gathering. Automated bidding strategies should not be enabled until you have at least 30 conversions per month to give the platform sufficient learning data.
Michéal Breslin is the Managing Director of Lever Digital, a B2B PPC agency specialising in paid search for SaaS, FinTech, and eCommerce companies. With over 10 years in B2B paid media, Michéal has helped companies including GoCardless, Paddle, and Uplisting scale their paid acquisition programmes.
Ready to explore whether Microsoft Ads is right for your B2B SaaS company? Get a free paid media proposal and we'll include a Microsoft Ads opportunity assessment as part of the review.



